Wednesday, 15 July 2020   Subscription to updates  RSS
Wednesday, 15 July 2020   Subscription to updates  RSS
22:01, 06 September 2018

Old Kavanaugh e-mail questioning if Roe v Wade is &#039settled law of the land&#039 revealed

Old Kavanaugh email questioning if Roe v Wade is &#039settled law of the land&#039 revealed

Old Kavanaugh e-mail questioning if Roe v Wade is &#039settled law of the land&#039 revealed

During his Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Brett Kavanaugh has known as Roe v. Wade an &ldquoimportant precedent&rdquo that has been &ldquoreaffirmed many occasions.&rdquo Even so, in newly released emails from the Senate Judiciary Committee, Kavanaugh after questioned regardless of whether the landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion in the U.S. must be regarded &ldquosettled law.&rdquo

&ldquoI am not positive that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme court level since Court can often overrule its precedent, and 3 current Justices on the Court would do so,&rdquo Kavanaugh mentioned in a 2003 email.

When asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D.-Calif., the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to clarify his thoughts on Roe, Kavanaugh said he was referring in the e mail to &ldquowhat legal scholars&rdquo may say.

&ldquoI think my comment in the e-mail was that might be overstating the position of legal scholars and so it wasn&rsquot a technically accurate description in the letter of what legal scholars thought,&rdquo Kavanaugh stated, adding, &ldquoThe broader point was basically that I believe it was overstating some thing about legal scholars, and I&rsquom usually concerned with accuracy, and I thought that was not fairly [an] correct description of all legal scholars since it referred to all.&rdquo

Kavanaugh then reiterated that he believes Roe v. Wade to &ldquobe an crucial precedent of the Supreme Court&rdquo that has &ldquobeen reaffirmed numerous occasions.&rdquo

Sen. Patty Murray, a Democrat who is not on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Kavanaugh &ldquohas been pretending he wouldn&rsquot overturn Roe v. Wade by hiding behind the notion that it&rsquos &lsquosettled law&rsquo and &lsquoprecedent.&rsquo&rdquo

&ldquoThat&rsquos what he&rsquos been saying in his hearings so far, and he&rsquos hoping that fools women across the country into thinking their rights and freedoms are secure,&rdquo Murray mentioned Thursday.


Several senators questioned Kavanaugh about his opinions on abortion for the duration of his confirmation hearing. He said he understood the &ldquoimportance of the issue.&rdquo

&ldquoOne of the essential items to hold in thoughts about Roe v. Wade is that it has been reaffirmed many times more than the previous 45 years, as you know, and most prominently, most importantly, reaffirmed in Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992,&rdquo Kavanaugh mentioned.

The nomination of Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court set off warning bells from females&rsquos rights groups and liberals &ndash including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton &ndash who warned he could move to overturn Roe v. Wade.

But even if Kavanaugh is appointed to the bench, the court most likely wouldn&rsquot have an influence on Roe anytime soon, Carol Sanger, a Columbia Law College professor, previously&nbsptold Fox News.

&ldquoThe court can&rsquot make a decision to adjust a case until it has a case just before it,&rdquo Sanger pointed out. &ldquoAnd the court chooses its own docket so it gets to choose what circumstances it hears. We don&rsquot know no matter whether they feel there is a excellent case coming up to rule on Roe. They may not want to do that appropriate away.&rdquo

If such a case did come up, and the court decided to overturn Roe, abortion wouldn&rsquot necessarily turn into automatically illegal in the U.S. Instead, it would leave the concern up to the states.


Only four states have so-named &ldquotrigger laws&rdquo in spot that would make abortion practically automatically illegal if Roe v. Wade is overturned. But other states already have laws on the books, pre-dating Roe, which legalizes abortion.

Kavanaugh&rsquos involvement in a case of an undocumented teenager who sought to be released from custody to have an abortion has come beneath scrutiny during the hearing. Whilst the court at some point permitted her to have the process, Kavanaugh disapproved. He argued if the government helped the 17-year-old get the process, then it ignores its &ldquopermissible interest in favoring fetal life, guarding the ideal interests of a minor and refraining from facilitating abortion.&rdquo

Republicans command a narrow 51-49 Senate majority. Party leaders have said they hope to have Kavanaugh confirmed by a floor vote by early October, when the next Supreme Court term starts.

Kaitlyn Schallhorn is a Reporter for Fox News. Follow her on Twitter:&[email protected]_Schallhorn.

Published at Thu, 06 Sep 2018 20:27:00 +0000

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2020 News: Today's News Headlines, Breaking News & Recent News from the World
Дизайн и поддержка: