Sunday, 25 October 2020   Subscription to updates  RSS
Sunday, 25 October 2020   Subscription to updates  RSS
5:11, 20 November 2017

NYT &ampampgt Education

NYT &ampampgt Education

In 2006, the endowments of Indiana University and Texas Christian University invested millions of dollars in a partnership, hoping to mint riches from oil, gas and coal.

The partnership was formed by the Houston-based Quintana Capital Group, whose principals include Donald L. Evans, an influential Texan and longtime supporter of former President George W. Bush. Small far more than a year earlier, Mr. Evans had left his cabinet position as commerce secretary.

Although the group had an impressive Texas pedigree, presidential cachet and ambitions for operations in the United States, the new partnership was established in the Cayman Islands. The founders promised their university and nonprofit investors that the partnership would attempt to avoid federal taxes by exploiting a loophole referred to as “blocker corporations,” which are generally established in tax havens about the world.

NYT &ampampgt Education

A trove of millions of leaked documents from a Bermuda-primarily based law firm, Appleby, reflects some of the tax wizardry utilized by American colleges and universities. Schools have increasingly turned to secretive offshore investments, the files show, which let them swell their endowments with blocker corporations, and steer clear of scrutiny of ventures involving fossil fuels or other problems that could set off campus controversy.

Buoyed by lucrative tax breaks, college endowments have amassed much more than $500 billion nationwide. The wealth is concentrated in a little group of schools, tilting toward private institutions like these in the Ivy League and other extremely selective colleges. About 11 % of greater-education institutions in the United States hold 74 percent of the cash, according to an evaluation in 2015 by the Congressional Analysis Service.

“It’s overwhelmingly weighted towards the 1 percent,” stated Dean Zerbe, former tax counsel to the Senate Finance Committee. “Most of the schools are the most elites in the country.”

The House Republican tax plan involves a 1.four percent tax on the investment income of private colleges and universities with endowment assets of $250,000 or more per student. It would not apply to public schools. If passed, the new tax would influence about 70 elite private colleges, though it would not touch the kind of offshore benefits the Texan partnership pursued.

On Monday, 45 education groups declared their opposition to the bill in a letter to Kevin Brady, the Texas Republican who is the chairman of the Residence Methods and Indicates Committee.

Tax ‘Blockers’

College and university endowment earnings are generally tax-exempt. But as endowments have sought greater investment returns in current years, they have shifted much more of their funds out of classic holdings like United States equities to alternative, potentially much more profitable investments. These consist of private equity and hedge funds that frequently borrow income, opening them up to tax consequences.

When schools earn earnings from enterprises unrelated to their core educational missions, they can be needed to spend a tax that was intended to avert nonprofits from competing unfairly with for-profit businesses.

Establishing an additional corporate layer in between private equity funds and endowments successfully blocks any taxable income from flowing to the endowments, the cause they are known as blocker corporations. The tax is instead owed by the corporations, which are established in no-tax or low-tax jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands or the British Virgin Islands.

“Congress is essentially subsidizing nonprofits by enabling them to engage in these transactions,” stated Norman I. Silber, a law professor at Hofstra University who co-authored a paper on blocker corporations in 2015. “They’re permitting them to borrow so that they can build up their endowments.”

The use of blocker corporations has raised concerns among policymakers in current years. That’s partly since they cost the United States Treasury millions of dollars, but also because they legitimize an opaque offshore network often used for nefarious purposes.

“They’re not cheating. They’re not hiding funds or disguising funds,” stated Samuel Brunson, a law professor at Loyola University Chicago who has studied endowment taxation. “But they’re adding cash to a technique that allows men and women, if they want to hide their funds, to do it.” Not only do the universities advantage — so does the wealthy and influential private equity business.

Possibly illustrating the sensitivity of the topic, officials at most of the college and university endowments that use blocker corporations, including Colgate, Dartmouth, Duke and Stanford, declined to comment especially, citing longstanding policies against discussing their investments. Amongst them was Matt Kavgian, the director of strategic communications for Indiana University’s $2 billion endowment, which had invested $ten million with Quintana.

An exception was the Quintana shareholder Texas Christian University, whose chief investment officer, Jim Hille, acknowledged that the $1.5 billion endowment had used blocker corporations. Mr. Hille said the selection to use one particular usually came down to no matter whether the anticipated return would offset the price of establishing a blocker corporation.

References to such corporations in the Appleby files, shared with The New York Instances by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, which obtained them from the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, date back at least to 2003. At that time, five elite schools — Columbia University, Dartmouth College, the University of Southern California, Stanford University and Johns Hopkins University — became partners in a Bermuda-based group known as H&ampampF Investors Blocker.

H&ampampF Investors Blocker was formed to invest with 1 of the largest private equity firms, Hellman &ampamp Friedman, in shares of Axel Springer, a German publisher of newspapers and magazines.

Minutes from meetings at Appleby’s workplace in Hamilton, Bermuda, never ever mention tax avoidance or even clarify why the word “blocker” is utilized in the partnership’s title. But an audit by Ernst &ampamp Young, contained in the minutes, shows that H&ampampF Investors Blocker would owe no federal revenue tax.

By 2008, the University of Texas technique — whose endowment final year was $24.two billion, behind Harvard’s ($34.five billion) and Yale’s ($25.4 billion) — asked Appleby to set up a Cayman Islands organization known as TX Liquidity Capital so “certain tax benefits will accrue to the program,” documents show.

Colgate University, with an endowment worth $822 million final year, stood to benefit from blocker corporations in 2008 when it invested in Genstar Capital, a private equity fund specializing in leveraged buyouts, according to the records. One particular investor in that Cayman Islands partnership, known as Genstar Capital Partners V HV, took pains to contain a handwritten a note close to his signature: “elect to invest via the blocker.” Other investors have been Dartmouth, Stanford and a Duke fund known as Gothic Corporation.

A Shift in Public Attitude

Although legal, blocker corporations are portion of a program of endowment tax breaks fueling an undercurrent of populist anger. A lot of students across the country struggle beneath huge college debt. At the same time, critics say, some wealthy schools use these tax benefits to stockpile endowments that exceed the gross national solution of complete countries.

Last year, three influential Republican legislators, led by Senator Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, sent a letter to 56 private universities with endowments of $1 billion or a lot more, requesting data on “the quite a few tax preferences” they take pleasure in. “Despite these big and developing endowments,” the letter stated, “many colleges and universities have raised tuition far in excess of inflation.”

So far, universities have mobilized lobbyists to emphasize the public advantages they provide, beating back challenges to their tax breaks. But there is proof that the mood has shifted, mentioned Charlie Eaton, a professor at the University of California, Merced, who has studied endowment tax breaks.

“In some approaches, the anti-elite and anti-university spirit of Trumpism could develop a favorable environment on Capitol Hill for some type of action on this,” Dr. Eaton said. “That’s part of the explanation universities urgently need to grapple with this. Simply because men and women genuinely really feel that our elite universities have turn into islands of wealth.”

In a study this year, Dr. Eaton estimated that a trio of tax breaks benefiting universities costs federal taxpayers $19.6 billion a year. Taxpayers, many of them wealthy, get breaks when they donate to colleges. Tax-totally free municipal bonds allow schools to borrow funds at low rates. And for the most portion, endowment investment returns are tax-free.

Controversial Ventures

A number of Appleby documents provide a glimpse into the complex monetary transactions and investments, some controversial, that university endowments engage in all more than the world, aside from using blockers.

Universities have been below pressure from each students and activists to shift to “green” investments in response to climate adjust, as effectively as to take social policy and global governance problems into account in investments.

The Appleby records show that investment funds of Columbia and Duke, each ranked in the top 20 endowments, held shares as recently as 2015 in Ferrous Sources, registered in the Isle of Man. Its major company is iron mining in Brazil.

The organization drew criticism there with a planned 480 kilometer pipeline to transport iron slurry from a mine in Minas Gerais to a port.

“Major demonstrations took location against this project, which culminated in the creation of a campaign,’” researchers wrote in a 2015 paper published in the journal Society &ampamp Nature.

A 2010 environmental study of the pipeline revealed that more than 110,000 folks may possibly be affected by noise, dust, soil degradation and water top quality issues. The project was postponed in 2012 after a downturn in iron rates.

The company, Ferrous Resources, declined to comment, except to say that the project had been discontinued.

Columbia, which owned a lot more than eight million shares in Ferrous Recources, or 1.1 % of the business, declined to comment. Numerous investment funds connected to Duke, which also declined to comment, held more than two million shares in the business.

While some schools have announced shifts away from controversial investments, other individuals have pointed out that divesting from fossil fuels would almost certainly lead to a significant drop in operating funds.

Underscoring endowments’ reliance on hydrocarbon holdings, 10 schools invested in a Cayman Islands partnership in 2012 identified as EnCap Energy Capital Fund IX-C, portion of EnCap Investments, a private equity firm identified for the acquisition and improvement of North American oil and gas properties.

Amongst the investors have been the University of Alabama, DePauw, Northeastern, Pittsburgh, Purdue, Reed College, Rutgers, Syracuse, Texas Tech and Washington State.

Published at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2020 News: Today's News Headlines, Breaking News & Recent News from the World
Дизайн и поддержка: